• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• To: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:46:20 +0000

Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
> 
> 4. No namespaces, PIs e t.c. ( they're addressed by 5/6/7 ).
> 5. Reasonable Schema.
> 6. Reasonable Xpath.
> 7. Reasonable XSL.

Most interesting - how do you do plan to do xslt without namespaces?

Francis.
-- 
Francis Norton.

why not?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ubiquitous XML?
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>

• References:
  • ubiquitous XML?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: ubiquitous XML?
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces, Architectural Forms & XML Schemas
• Next by Date: RE: ubiquitous XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: ubiquitous XML?
• Next by thread: Re: ubiquitous XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread