• From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>
• To: francis@r...
• Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 08:32:25 -0800

> > 
> > 4. No namespaces, PIs e t.c. ( they're addressed by 5/6/7 ).
> > 5. Reasonable Schema.
> > 6. Reasonable Xpath.
> > 7. Reasonable XSL.
> 
> Most interesting - how do you do plan to do xslt without namespaces?

Easy. For example - XSLScript (www.pault.com) has no need 
in namespaces.

Rgds.Paul.

PS. I'm sorry, I'l not more  discuss xml-linux on XML-list, because 
I think that will be offtopic.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ubiquitous XML?
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>

• References:
  • ubiquitous XML?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: ubiquitous XML?
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>
  • Re: ubiquitous XML?
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: sgml vs. XML
• Next by Date: load() method on an asp file??
• Previous by thread: Re: ubiquitous XML?
• Next by thread: Re: ubiquitous XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread