• From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>
• To: cavre@m...
• Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:54:02 +0200

At 12:05 18/10/2000 -0400, Cavre wrote:
>Why would anyone want a organization which has proven to 
>be less than clear in their recommendations to lead the way 
>to a "Semantic Web" which should provide clarity and understanding
>through the use of semantical links of some design?

I don't think that's really the point. If anyone or anything could provide
and inject clarity and understanding into something as ginormous as the web
I would have dropped out of my philosophy studies to run some sort of
hyperhyped semantic consulting startup :)



-- robin b.
Smoking is one of the leading causes of statistics.

• References:
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?)
    • From: Cavre <cavre@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE:Realisticproposals to the W3C?)
• Next by Date: RE: Will XML change the character of W3C?
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF, the "semantic web", and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realist icproposals to the W3C?)
• Next by thread: Re: RDF, the "semantic web",and the nadir of AI (was RE: Realisticproposals to the W3C?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread