Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
In one Thread... ***********Bullard, Claude L (Len) said*********** Standard vocabularies for domains were pretty well understood by scholastics in the middle ages. That wasn't AI. It was common sense. The W3C standardizes common sense. Film at 11. <snip> ****************************************************** and in another... ***********Robin Berjon said************************* The first sentence of http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Interpretation.html is "The semantic web is a computer system, a distributed machine which should function so as to perform socially useful tasks". This doesn't tell us what it is, but the emphasis on "socially" is imho important. <snip> ******************************************************* Why would anyone want a organization which has proven to be less than clear in their recommendations to lead the way to a "Semantic Web" which should provide clarity and understanding through the use of semantical links of some design? Curious Cavre
|
