• From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
• To: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@i...>
• Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:35:43 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Miloslav Nic wrote:

> Reading through the XML Schema specification, I am doubting what
> chronologically less actually means
> 
> is the 10th October 2000 chronologically less or greater than 12th
> October 2000 ?
> 
> I can imagine an explanation for both variants, so which one is the
> right one?

What real incentive would there be for diverging from the semantics of
date1 < date2 in standard SQL (in which date1 is earlier than date2)?

-- 
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline@r...
http://www.rksystems.com

• References:
  • What does it mean: chronologically less
    • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
• Next by Date: Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
• Previous by thread: What does it mean: chronologically less
• Next by thread: RE: What does it mean: chronologically less
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread