• From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:17:38 +0800

Dave Winer wrote:

> My pov: XML should be providing a means for interop between all kinds of
> apps. It should be happening now.

"Should"
 seems to suggest that the makers of specs are responsible for vendor's
product cycle decisions.  If applications have a 3 year life, and if it
takes 2 product cycles to get anything well-integrated, then we can
start to say "should" in about 2004.  Perhaps incremental updates over
the Web should speed this up.

Cheers 
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• References:
  • interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML, 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: Re: What does it mean: chronologically less
• Previous by thread: RE: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
• Next by thread: Re: interoperability (was Re: Obfuscating XML with namespaces)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread