• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:42:17 -0400

At 04:09 PM 10/13/00 -0400, Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM wrote:
>Let's face it: If XML was a commercial product, we'd still be in beta-test
>on many of the things which are now RECs.

There are some who would suggest that might not be so bad...

though everyone has a different opinion about which RECs that applies to.

I suggest that companies take that approach to all W3C work in my last
point on:
http://www.simonstl.com/articles/interop/interop13.html

Given the distinction some folks make between 'STANDARDS' and 'w3c
recommendations', it may not be such a bad approach overall.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

• References:
  • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
    • From: Joseph Kesselman/Watson/IBM <keshlam@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RELAX to ISO
• Next by Date: RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Previous by thread: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Next by thread: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread