• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: aarons@d..., Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 20:18:57 -0400

At 04:27 PM 8/2/00 -0600, Aaron Skonnard wrote:
>Once XSD and XInclude are done, DTDs are dead weight for the Infoset. It's
>really about the fundamental abstractions that we can infer from XML 1.0 +
>Namespaces in light of our current direction.

Whose current direction?

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
    • From: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@d...>

• References:
  • Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final Review Draft)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
    • From: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Next by Date: Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Previous by thread: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
• Next by thread: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread