• From: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@d...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, Xml-Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 19:31:06 -0600

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 6:19 PM
> To: aarons@d...; Xml-Dev
> Subject: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final
> Review Draft)
>
>
> At 04:27 PM 8/2/00 -0600, Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> >Once XSD and XInclude are done, DTDs are dead weight for the Infoset.
It's
> >really about the fundamental abstractions that we can infer from XML 1.0
+
> >Namespaces in light of our current direction.
>
> Whose current direction?

The direction of the W3C and the world of component/system developers wrt
type information.

-aaron

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - FinalReviewDraft)
• Next by Date: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
• Previous by thread: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
• Next by thread: RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread