• From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@h...>
• To: "'xml-dev@x...'" <xml-dev@X...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:40:17 -0600

Roger Costello wrote:

> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Question 3.
> > 
> > Consider a respository of namespaces (and the elements 
> associated with
> > the namespaces).  For managing things it might be easier to have one
> > namespace for the collection than separate namespaces.  Any 
> > thoughts on
> > this?
> > 
> 

This is the type of scenario that motivated my comment (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000AprJun/0159.html) that became LC-117 on the last call issues.

In addition, by having the document specify individual resources for each namespace,
there is no mechanism for a schema designer to enforce that any expectations
about the elements that he has specifically included from other namespaces
which basically makes the uri on the import a joke.


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: usage of XSL FO. GCA XML Europe CD
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's Role in the XML Community (WAS RE: Important: The SAXC++/C/COM Muddle)
• Previous by thread: usage of XSL FO. GCA XML Europe CD
• Next by thread: newbie question: using < in entity declaration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread