• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 11:25:12 -0400

Tim Bray wrote:

> but then how can it be consistent to leave in \n and DEL and so on?

Tab and (various forms of) newline are pretty much unavoidable for
practical reasons, XML being textual, but IMHO leaving in U+007F through U+009F
was an infelicity without justification, that unfortunately we are stuck with.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: control characters
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • Re: control characters
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xslv updated
• Next by Date: Fwd: Xerces 1.1.1 doesn't support facet constraints???
• Previous by thread: Re: control characters
• Next by thread: Re: control characters
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread