• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 06:47:53 -0700

At 11:25 AM 19/06/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>Tab and (various forms of) newline are pretty much unavoidable for
>practical reasons, XML being textual, but IMHO leaving in U+007F through U+009F
>was an infelicity without justification, that unfortunately we are stuck with.

Yup; as with a couple of other things, if any one person had jumped up and
said "hey, take those out" everyone else probably would have said "OK". -T.


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: control characters
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: control characters
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: control characters
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [very personal analysis] .com, .net and .org
• Next by Date: input/output matrix ofXML tools, e.g. based on: data, schema, code
• Previous by thread: Re: control characters
• Next by thread: Re: control characters
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread