• From: "KenNorth" <KenNorth@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:02:56 -0700

John F. Schlesinger wrote:
> Is it a TLA (three letter acronym) which stands for nothing? How ironic.

There are other former acronyms, usually because someone wanted to
disassociate from the past. When the technology changes, you write a new
standard or use a trademark. About two years ago, I wrote something that
mentioned "Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)." When it appeared in print,
Sun notified me JDBC was no longer an acronym -- it was their trademark.

So what's to keep someone from trademarking the important Web-related
acronyms? The W3C is  registered and XHTML and MathML are trademarks, but
what about others?









***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: sequel=> SQL, SGML=> XML
    • From: johns@s... (John F. Schlesinger)

• Prev by Date: Re: The problem with typography (with or without flow objects)
• Next by Date: Re: sequel=> SQL, SGML=> XML
• Previous by thread: RE: sequel=> SQL, SGML=> XML
• Next by thread: Re: sequel=> SQL, SGML=> XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread