Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Michael S. Brothers" wrote: > > ... > > Can we perhaps have the "semi-semantic" Web (in the meantime, until > HAL is born) by actually assigning meaning (DTD, Schema, mapping info, > whatever) to the namespace URI? Where is the meaning in a DTD, schema or mapping info? If I give you <?xml version="1.0"?> <FOO/> How would a DTD/schema or mapping info help either you or the computer to understand it? They might help you to *process* it, which is an important goal, but it that is not the same as understanding it. I see virtue in the idea of the namespace referent being a known vocabulary with pointers to various processing specifications. But I don't call think that that would lead us to a "semantic web". Perhaps a more useful web, but not a semantic one. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself Just how compassionate can a Republican get before he has to leave the GOP and join Vegans for Global Justice? ... One moment, George W. Bush is holding a get-to-know-you meeting with a bunch of gay Republicans. The next he is holding forth on education or the environment ... It is enough to make a red-blooded conservative choke on his spotted-owl drumstick. - April 29th, Economist *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
