• From: "Brown, Bryan" <bryanb@u...>
• To: "'xml-dev@x...'" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:09:10 -0700

>> So after reading 'PUBLIC' you have no idea if you are looking for "S 
>>S PubidLiteral S SystemLiteral " or just "S PubidLiteral" 
>> 
>>What am i missing ? 
> Nothing, but what's the problem? It's ambiguous (in the content model 
> sense of non-deterministic), but the productions in the spec are not 
> intended to correspond that directly to an implementation. 

Ok, well I have a parser that i wrote from scratch, and of the 83 or so
productions this is the only one my parser has a problem with. If when a
NotationDecl has a publicID the systemliteral is optional (which is what the
current spec implies) then the spec should have had productions like the
following
[83] NotationDecl ::= '<!NOTATION' S Name S (SystemID | PublicID )
[84] PublicID ::= 'PUBLIC' S PubicLiteral (S SystemLiteral)?
[85] SystemID ::= 'SYSTEM' S SystemLiteral	
Or
[[83] NotationDecl ::= '<!NOTATION' S Name S (ExternalID | PublicID )
[84] PublicID ::= 'PUBLICID' S PubicLiteral
- Bryan
	



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: Re: Toward the self-describing web [was: Irony heaped on irony]
• Next by Date: Re: Syntax and semantics
• Previous by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Next by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread