• From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@t...>
• To: xml-editor@w..., "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 16:01:43 -0500

On Wed, 24 May 2000 15:41:35 -0400 (EDT), "Liam R. E. Quin"
<liamquin@i...> wrote:

>It does mean that the parser has to check the encoding, though.

How can a parser get past the XML declaration without knowing (or at
least assuming) the encoding?

-Steve Schafer


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread