Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Wed, 24 May 2000, John Cowan wrote: > Issue PE28: > > Currently the XML Recommendation is silent about the handling of > documents that contain "impossible" bytes. For example, the byte 0xFF > cannot appear in any UTF-8 encoded document. This seems to me to be sensible. It does mean that the parser has to check the encoding, though. > Issue PE24: > > Currently, system identifiers may or may not contain fragment identifiers > (the string beginning with "#" at the end of a URI reference). > We are considering changing this language to say that "it is an error" to > use a fragment identifier. What about XPointer? #id(simon) You have to allow fragment ids, and to make them optional, I think. Lee -- Liam Quin, Barefoot Computing, Toronto; The barefoot programmer Ankh on irc.sorcery.net, http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ co-author, The XML Specification Guide forthcoming: The Open Source XML Database Toolkit *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
