• From: David DS Barnes <d.d.barnes@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 14:34:56 +0000

does the transmeta chip/concept have a better standing?

Len Bullard wrote:
> 
> 3.  The Intel announcement seems to be breezing past everyone.
> Has anyone yet figured out how markup languages are chosen to be
> burned into firmware? The announcement says
> it will support "the main" ones.  Who chooses? Intel?
> Is Intel choosing not the same thing
> as bundling an application language (say HTML) handler into
> the operating system and forcing it?  If the local owners get to choose,
> then like local namespace registries, it is a good thing.  If
> Intel chooses, then one might want to reexamine monopolies
> and restriction of trade and innovation issues.
> 

David
-- 
David DS Barnes
	mechanical eng,imperial college		|	t:0207 594 7181
	exhibition rd, london, sw7 2bx		|	f:0207 594 7127

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Myths and Misunderstanding
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Multi lingual glossary or dictionary DTD
• Next by Date: Packaging revisited, XPDL
• Previous by thread: Re: Myths and Misunderstanding
• Next by thread: Announce xmlBlaster release 0.76
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread