• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Michael Champion <Mike.Champion@s...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 12:17:29 -0400

Michael Champion wrote:

> I strongly agree, and hope this is addressed in the corrected version of XML
> 1.0 if it ever comes out, or in XML 1.1 / 2.0.  A colleague implementing an
> XML parser "from scratch" --  that is, without previous exposure to all the
> folklore that one picks up from SGML, XML-DEV, deconstructing other people's
> code, etc. -- stumbled over all sorts of little problems with the
> standardized productions.

If any notes on these little problems exist, however rough they may be,
please send them to xml-editor@w... so that they can be considered for
incorporation in the official errata at
http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata .

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: "Brown, Bryan" <bryanb@u...>
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>

• Prev by Date: schemas and namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: Requirements for semantic web
• Previous by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Next by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread