• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: 18 May 2000 09:23:33 GMT

Brown, Bryan <bryanb@u...> wrote:

>	So after reading 'PUBLIC' you have no idea if you are looking for "S
>S PubidLiteral S SystemLiteral " or just "S PubidLiteral"
>
>What am i missing ?

Nothing, but what's the problem?  It's ambiguous (in the content model
sense of non-deterministic), but the productions in the spec are not
intended to correspond that directly to an implementation.

-- Richard
-- 
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Ambiguity in XML spec
    • From: "Brown, Bryan" <bryanb@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Next by Date: Re: Irony heaped on irony
• Previous by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Next by thread: Re: Ambiguity in XML spec
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread