Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
One very interesting point was brought up in this debate I had not seen before: Patent filers have an affirmative obligation to disclose all prior art of which they are aware, and FAILING TO DO SO IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. What if we were to respond to patents for which there is no prior art by sending the filers (not the Patent Office) information about prior art by both email and registered mail? They would then be obligated to take note of this work in their patent application, and failing to do so would be grounds for both invalidating the patent and criminal prosecution. Thoughts? +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
