• From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:26:02 +0100

At 10:33 AM 4/3/00 -0400, Bob Kline wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
>
>> [Eloquent plea for a definition of conformance ...]
>
>Peter:
>
>I'm afraid you'll find that an appreciation for the value of defining
>conformance is not universally shared by the drivers of the XML bus. 

Ah, but XML-DEV does not suffer from bus-drivers. It is like a swarm of
communal animals which takes many directions according to many driving
forces. So I am confidently optimistic that something may come from this.
 
	P.


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Arbortext makes Java catalog classes available for use by XML processors
• Next by Date: Catalogs (was Re: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Previous by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread