• From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
• To: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
• Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:33:18 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:

> [Eloquent plea for a definition of conformance ...]

Peter:

I'm afraid you'll find that an appreciation for the value of defining
conformance is not universally shared by the drivers of the XML bus.  
As illustration see the thread "No Standard way to reference XML
Schema?" late last year on this list.

http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/xml-dev-Dec-1999/1072.html

Cheers,
Bob


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• References:
  • RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java to XML
• Next by Date: Re: Case sensitivity
• Previous by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by thread: RE: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread