• From: THOMAS PASSIN <tpassin@i...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:07:12 -0400

I'd like to reiterate my earlier comment that a statement by a document that
it requires a certain feature is DIFFERENT from a features manifest for a
parser that lets you find features and perhaps turn them on or off.  One is
a property of a document, the other is a behavior of a piece of software.

It seems likely that these two concepts could be coordinated, or at least
informed by each other.  For example, they should use the same names for
equivalent features, like "external-entities".


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Feature Manifest
    • From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
  • Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Next by Date: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Previous by thread: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Next by thread: Re: Feature Manifest
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread