• From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@s...>
• To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: 07 Apr 2000 18:41:39 +0100

Tom> THOMAS PASSIN <URL:mailto:tpassin@i...>

0> In article <001f01bfa092$3da29dc0$5c2a08d1@i...>, Tom
0> wrote:

Tom> I'd like to reiterate my earlier comment that a statement by a
Tom> document that it requires a certain feature is DIFFERENT from a
Tom> features manifest for a parser ...
Tom>
Tom> It seems likely that these two concepts could be coordinated, or
Tom> at least informed by each other.  For example, they should use
Tom> the same names for equivalent features, like "external-entities".

The same short names, or the same URIs?

(Rhetorical question, to provoke thought.  I'm not particularly
interested in getting an answer.)

-- 


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@i...>
  • Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@c...>
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
    • From: THOMAS PASSIN <tpassin@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parser Behaviour (serious)
• Next by Date: Re: XML doc valid against more than one DTD / Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Next by thread: Re: Feature Manifest (Was:RE: Parser Behaviour (serious))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread