Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
james anderson wrote: > Stefan Haustein wrote: > > So we have less problems for serializing a Lisp extension versus > > more problems for Smalltalk, Delphi, C++, JAVA.... > > > > I do not think that will help RDF becoming widely used. > > I'm not marketing. The request was for an example. CLOS is one. Well, the request was for a _relevant_ example. I would say an OOPL is relevant if it has at least 10% of the useres of any from my list, is that acceptable? > In general orthogonality is to be admired rathern than admonished. > Especially in a representation language which sets generality and > extensibility as one of its goals. What you claim for orthogonality holds for locality as well. What I wanted to say is "why not just follow the approach people have voted for with their feet already (java, c++,... -like) if both have their tradeoff?". Also, global properties seem like modern "goto"s to me. Best regards, Stefan -- Stefan Haustein University of Dortmund Computer Science VIII www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
