• From: james anderson <james.anderson@m...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:36:49 +0100

facets don't sound like the right thing. they imply a semantic coherence
where none is to be expected.

> Yes, that's the problem. However, there is an interesting suggestion
> from Stefan Decker for a way out:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0170.html
>


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>

• References:
  • Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
    • From: Vilya Harvey <vilya@n...>
  • Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>
  • Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
    • From: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@j...>
  • Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Structured attributes
• Next by Date: RE: XLink - Assert linking relationships among more than two resource s
• Previous by thread: Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
• Next by thread: Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread