• From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 11:35:30 -0000

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote,
> This particular conflict will come up any time somebody does
>
> import java.net.*;
>
> They don't need to be using ContentHandler specifically.

That's true, but to be honest I don't care. Importing in '*' form
isn't good practice because it hides dependency structure. That's
not important in small projects, but once you get up to hundreds 
of packages and thousands of classes it can be a very big deal: 
try refactoring a significant chunk of code when you can't tell 
at a glance what depends on what.

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                       Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect        5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)20 8817 4030               London, W6 0LJ, England
msabin@c...          http://www.cromwellmedia.com/



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: org.xml.sax.ContentHandler conflicts with java.net.ContentHan dler
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
• Next by Date: RE: ANNOUNCE: New release of X-Tract
• Previous by thread: geometry first, MathML, CAD, etc
• Next by thread: Re: org.xml.sax.ContentHandler conflicts with java.net.ContentHan dler
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread