Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Miles Sabin <msabin@c...> writes:
> That's true, but to be honest I don't care. Importing in '*' form
> isn't good practice because it hides dependency structure. That's
> not important in small projects, but once you get up to hundreds
> of packages and thousands of classes it can be a very big deal:
> try refactoring a significant chunk of code when you can't tell
> at a glance what depends on what.
Thanks for the support. I've always considered import package.* to be
the sign of either
a) a novice (forgivable); or
b) expremely sloppy coding.
Mind you, there are times that sloppy coding is OK (such as whipping
up a quick demo).
I understand the concerns with both XMLReader and ContentHandler, but
I'm very reluctant to make changes this late in the SAX2 process, and
we've already spent a lot of time discussing the XMLReader name. Do
people feel very strongly about renaming either of these?
All the best,
David
p.s. The names should work fine in C++.
--
David Megginson david@m...
http://www.megginson.com/
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
