Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Steven R. Newcomb" wrote:
> Think of the generic identifier as the *value* (not the *name*) of the
> one-and-only, always-required "nameless" attribute.
Okay. Adopting this convention, then, architectural processors have
the following capabilities (without regard to how they are expressed):
1. To rename or remove any attribute of an element, including the nameless
attribute.
2. When the nameless attribute is removed, to choose between (a) removing the
element entire and (b) replacing it with its content.
3. To do these things conditionally on (a) the original generic identifier
of the element or (b) the presence or absence of an ID attribute.
4. To validate the result against a chosen DTD (erroneously called
the "meta-DTD").
Is this correct and complete (neglecting features of the SGML data model
which do not have XML counterparts)?
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
