Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Brownell <david-b@p...> writes:
> Ken MacLeod wrote:
> >
> > In several cases I would prefer internalEntityReference() and
> > externalEntityReference() event handlers that simply report the
> > reference but do not resolve the reference, or that call back the
> > parser to further resolve them.
>
> Using a single unSkippedEntity (String name) call, you tell them apart
> if you track their entity declarations (with a DeclHandler). Is that
> level of work OK for you?
Do you mean skippedEntity()?
Yes, I'm OK with using entity declarations (DeclHandler) to
distinguish internal and external entities.
What I mean is that I'd rather have an entityReference() handler than
{start, end}Entity() handlers.
There's some issues with the processing model though. There would
probably need to be a mode feature where either entityReference() is
called or entities are resolved. More difficult, if a handler wanted
to know _both_ the entity reference and the resolved content (which is
probably where {start, end}Entity() is proposed).
Entities in attributes is a whole 'nother can of worms.
-- Ken
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
