• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XML-DEV <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:25:49 -0500 (EST)

David Brownell writes:

 > Keeping in mind that the most common example of this problem is
 > 
 >     <element attribute="some &entity; &references; are here"/>
 > 
 > I'd think basically anyone actually trying to use the start/end entity
 > callbacks would conclude that they just can't work.

How about if we renamed them to start/endExternalEntity and forgot
altogether about signalling internal entity boundaries?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
    • From: Michael Fuller <msf@i...>
  • Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
    • From: Michael Fuller <msf@i...>
  • Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: relative ordering of startDocument() & startDTD() events?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread