• From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:27:49 -0000

David Megginson wrote,
> Or allowing apps to pull it from the command line or a 
> configuration file (though it's best still to provide a 
> default).

Well, that's quite close to being an ad hoc factory solution.

Bear in mind that not all SAX clients are applications: there's
no guarantee that they'll have either a command line or an
appropriate System properties environment.

> For the SAX core, I'm leaning towards a rewrite of the SAX1
> ParserFactory into XMLReaderFactory, only with methods that 
> throw SAXException (as David B. suggested).

I'd prefer this to nothing at all, but it still leaves a lot
of issues unresolved. For example, we still have the
embarassing problem of having to instantiate a reader before
we can test it's features.

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                       Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect        5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)20 8817 4030               London, W6 0LJ, England
msabin@c...          http://www.cromwellmedia.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by Date: Re: A certain difficulty
• Previous by thread: RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by thread: RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread