Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
THOMAS PASSIN wrote: > > I think we need to find a way to express these ideas starting at a high > level without much complexity, and moving on to more and more detail. For > example, Henry's grove drawing that Peter posted the link to is awfully > complex unless you are already familiar with the material (I'm not). For the sake of discussion and the thread, throw away the non-illuminating diagrams and documents. Comment back precisely to exactly what Eliot says. So far, work out what a grove(node) is and how to determine if an element IS_A node. It is complicated because it is done. Force it through the sieve of the thread. OTW, MMTT. len
|
