Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 28 Feb, David Brownell wrote: > Len Bullard wrote: >> >> Dave Winer wrote: >> >> > We've done an evaluation of SVG, and are very very excited about it. >> >> Ummm.... cool, but not killer app. This is the Goldfarb/Chamberlain >> paper finally implemented and well done. I like it. OTOH, 2D is a >> degenerate case of 3D so this is on a collision course with X3D. > > That's a troll, right? Not necessarily. For example, some API's (eg. SGI *GL) assume z=0 for 2D primitives using a 3D library to render. Not exactly "complex". I fancy, at some point in the future, there will be some overlap. Not that I mind that, however, although it is sure to create headaches for those trying to map documents between the two. > Frankly, http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/ sure looks enough for me to use! Definately :-) Have SVG advocates seen some battles-from-the-SVG-front-line comments at http://www.levien.com/svg/shame.html ? Andrew Cassin acassin@c... *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
