• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:57:19 -0800

Stefan Haustein wrote:
> 
> Would adding a recommendation to the SAX documentation
> "please include a configuration file" be an acceptable
> solution?

I don't know about configuration file, but it does seem
appropriate to say that every SAX parser should come with
basic documentation including:

	- SAX2 features/modes supported
	- default settings for those modes
	- SAX2 properties supported

Of course I think conformance statements for XML would
be appropriate too.

- Dave

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: In praise of SVG
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by thread: [JOB OFFER LU,FR,BE] looking for JAVA/XML programers (French description)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread