Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Megginson wrote: > > The vendors that you list were all pretty quiet during the SAX1 > discussions as well, but they all acted with astoundingly good faith > afterwards in implementing the API, and put real resources into > publicising the fact afterwards. > Why should they try to change a system running fine. Development of SAX at xml-dev with you as a kind of moderator avoids bad compromises resulting from two consortium members not willing to give up their position, ending up with having redundancy in the standard. SAX is a good standard, and the big vendors can use it without putting man power and money into standardization groups... Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Haustein University of Dortmund Computer Science VIII www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de
|
