• From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: 10 Feb 2000 12:16:21 GMT

In article <00c301bf7372$28616240$5df5c13f@PaulTchistopolskii>,
Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...> wrote:

>I proposed to change the semantics of ANY to 
>'anything well-formed is fine'. 

Regardless of the reasons for this, I don't think there is any chance
of making such changes to XML.

XML Schemas are likely to provide this functionality, see:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-openness

-- Richard
-- 
Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers.

"The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high
speed networks." - Sam Wilson

• References:
  • Why ANY is so restrictive?
    • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C public lists (was Re: The Power of Groves)
• Next by Date: Re: Democracy and the Future of SAX
• Previous by thread: Re: Why ANY is so restrictive?
• Next by thread: Re: Why ANY is so restrictive?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread