• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:31:23 -0000

> > This is a serious concern for me - I'd be happy to see the terminology
> > change from 'parser' to 'emitter' - it'd make explaining the inputs and
> > outputs on SAX2 ParserFilters a lot easier.
> 
> I really hate "emitter", but I could live with "EventProducer" if
> people really liked that better than "XMLReader"; it does kill the
> potential XMLReader/XMLWriter symmetry, though.

EventProducer/EventConsumer? Its still got symmetry...

Cheers,

L.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Naming the SAX2 thingy
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@l...>
  • RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Naming the SAX2 thingy
    • From: Vilya Harvey <vilya@n...>
  • RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy
    • From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>

• References:
  • Naming the SAX2 thingy
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Xml] Inventory
• Next by Date: RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy
• Previous by thread: Naming the SAX2 thingy
• Next by thread: RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread