• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 13 Jan 2000 18:56:12 -0500

"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> writes:

> This is a serious concern for me - I'd be happy to see the terminology
> change from 'parser' to 'emitter' - it'd make explaining the inputs and
> outputs on SAX2 ParserFilters a lot easier.

I really hate "emitter", but I could live with "EventProducer" if
people really liked that better than "XMLReader"; it does kill the
potential XMLReader/XMLWriter symmetry, though.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• References:
  • RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
    • From: "Clark C. Evans" <clark.evans@m...>
  • Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Next by Date: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Previous by thread: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Next by thread: RE: Naming the SAX2 thingy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread