Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
In article <026601bf68ab$bb24ca30$866e230a@s...>, >After revisiting the description in XML 1.0 Sec. 4.1, It still looks non-WF >to me. See erratum E34 (http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata#E34) which applies to this section. The idea is that it can't be a well-formedness constraint if not all processors would see the error, and those that read the external subset would think it was perfectly good. It's invalid because it is not, as it claims, standalone. You might think that this is a bit odd, and I wouldn't disagree with you... -- Richard -- Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers. "The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high speed networks." - Sam Wilson xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
