• From: "Takuki Kamiya" <kamiya@r...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:48:57 +0900

While I tried to evaluate a parser's conformance against OASIS test cases,
I found a test case which I believe is not WF (well-formed) but is actually
be classified as NV (not valid) in the test suite.

Its case id is "inv-not-sa03" which looks just as follows.


<?xml version='1.0' standalone='yes'?>

<!DOCTYPE attributes SYSTEM "../valid/sa.dtd" [
    <!--
 External entity ref
    -->
]>

<attributes
    token = "b"
    id = "external-&number;"
  />


After revisiting the description in XML 1.0 Sec. 4.1, It still looks non-WF
to me.

Does anybody care to explain me if the XML above is indeed WF?

Thanks in advance,

= Takuki Kamiya  Phone: (045)476-4586 Fax: (045)476-4749   =
= FUJITSU LIMITED (COINS:7128-4217 NIFTY:HHA01731)         =


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: a case in OASIS test suite
    • From: "Takuki Kamiya" <kamiya@r...>
  • Re: a case in OASIS test suite
    • From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: RE: Hyphens vs underscores in element names
• Next by Date: Re: Call for unifying and clarifying XML 1.0, DOM, XPATH, and XML Infoset
• Previous by thread: Appologies, Re: An Open, industry-neutral schema for transaction processing
• Next by thread: Re: a case in OASIS test suite
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread