Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Peter Murray-Rust scripsit:
> - tool threw a fatal error because <!DOCTYPE was missing
The XML Rec does not forbid a parser to treat validation errors as fatal.
> - REC-xml and DOM specify DTD but spec.dtd is not mounted
Non-validating parsers that read DTDs are entitled to get upset
if the DTD cannot be read.
> - several tools regard the absence of a DTD as a fatal error (i.e. they
> appear to be validating by default).
Again, that behvaior is not forbidden.
--
John Cowan cowan@c...
I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
