• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 19 Jan 2000 18:00:53 +0100

>>>>> David Megginson <david@m...>:

> Personally, I like recursive-descent a lot (and probably wouldn't
> have finished writing the original AElfred parser otherwise).  Miles
> guesses correctly that SAX1 was push to accommodate existing
> parsers.

Doesn't recursive descent parsers have a problem with partial input
received from the net?  Don't you have to buffer up the entire file
before you start parsing?

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
  • Re: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@n...>

• References:
  • RE: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
  • Re: SAX2: pull interface
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2: pull interface
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: pull interface
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: pull interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread