Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Miles Sabin wrote: > Stefan Haustein wrote, > > Actually, I have already implemented a "Pull Wrapper" on > > top of SAX. > <snip/> > > My wrapper is LGPL-available at http://www.trantor.de/xml > > Hmm ... interesting. > > I guess that you must being running a plain SAX push parser in a > separate thread, and adding ParseEvents to a queue for > consumption by the pull client. At least, that's the usual > way of adapting push to pull. Yes, that's the way it works. > I must admit that if I needed a pull parser I'd rather have > one that could run in a single thread and didn't have the > queueing overhead. But that means I'd have to have a state- > machine rather than recursive descent based parser. Yes, having a direct pull implementation would be nicer. However, switching the implementation later shouldn't be a problem since the interface would not need to be changed. Best regards Stefan xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
