• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 09 Dec 1999 08:32:43 -0500

roddey@u... writes:

> 11) The class names (since we can't afford to use C++ namespaces) should be
> expanded to include a SAX prefix to avoid clashes. So SAXParser and
> SAXLocator and SAXAttributeList and so on.

Is it true that C++ namespaces are still a problem on any platform?  I
know that they actually do work under Windows, and the newer EGCS/GCC
have supported them for a while for all *nix variants (including
Linux) -- is it the Mac that doesn't have a proper C++ compiler yet?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: "Stewart Rubenstein" <sdr@c...>

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: roddey@u...

• Prev by Date: RE: A processing instruction for robots
• Next by Date: RE: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: RE: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread