Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Steinar Bang wrote: > > >>>>> roddey@u...: > > This statement: > > > ... If it were up to me, I'd say use every modern service of C++ and > > those who don't have compliant C++ implementation can have a good reason to > > get one. > [...] > > conflicts with this statement: > > > 2) We would prefer that all data come out of the SAX interfaces as > > raw wchar_t strings. This is the most flexible mechanism and does > > not lock people into using any particular implementation of a string > > object. It also has the highest potential performance for those > > folks who never need to put it into anything more formal than a raw > > array. > > std::basic_string<> _is_ a modern service of C++, and a pretty good > one from an API point of view. > > Personally I say: use std::basic_string<> and death to all other > string representations in C++. Agreed. I don't see why you need to obviate the C++ standard library string. If it's that bad, upgrade your compiler environment (e.g. Windows) or install an entirely new one (e.g. STLport and the like). -- Marc Lepage http://www.antimeta.com/ Minion open source game, RTS game programming, etc. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
