• From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
• To: "David Megginson" <david@m...>,"XMLDev list" <xml-dev-digest@i...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:43:40 -0000

> > > We could still have the callbacks throw SAXException, if that's what
> > > people prefer.
> >
> > Yes Please.  Exception really dont work well in VB and several other
> > langauges.
>
> I'm not quite sure I understand -- if exceptions don't work well in a
> language, then neither a general IOException nor a specific
> SAXException would be appropriate.

Provided we just have a class that represents an exception, which is passed
via a callback and doesnt depend on the usual java/C++ throw() mechanisms
I'll be happy.

Also, if we dont derive any of the SAX interfaces from anything that isnt
available in all langauges, I'll be even happlier.

Cheers.

Rich.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
    • From: Rajiv Mordani <Rajiv.Mordani@e...>
  • Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
  • Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Survey: Catalysis Templates
• Next by Date: Re: A weird question?
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
• Next by thread: RE: SAX2: DeclHandler
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread