• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XMLDev list <xml-dev-digest@i...>
• Date: 22 Dec 1999 16:27:48 -0500

Rajiv Mordani <Rajiv.Mordani@e...> writes:

> I am not sure what the intent is of having IOException. I think
> SAXException seems appropriate to me..

My plan is to have

  public class SAXException extends IOException
  {
  }

We could still have the callbacks throw SAXException, if that's what
people prefer.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>

• References:
  • Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
    • From: Rajiv Mordani <Rajiv.Mordani@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException?
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException?
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException?
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: DeclHandler
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread