[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
James Tauber wrote: > > > Yes and no. A schema-less XML document is absolutely fine for most > > things. If you need object semantics then you need a schema. > > But a schema doesn't tell you the semantics (although certain schema > languages might tell you how certain element types relate to others). I posted a mail early today entitled "Web Vision". It explains more clearly what I have in mind. It is a relatively new idea but I feel that it is possible to pack a lot of useful semantics into a schema. Matthew xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



